WAR!

WAR!

Although deatails are scetchy, it appears that Fiji has attacted Aleksania. In retaliaton, Aleksania sent it's F-15E's in a retalitory attack. More details as they are released.

More Details:

Newly released Info gives us a much clearer picture:

At about 4:30 pm (EST), the Commander John Birmingham Air Force Base, in Johnson City Aleksania, was bombed by Fijian jets. Aleksania Quickly responded by carrying out a bombing raid on Fiji's capital, Suva, with Aleksanian F-15E's and Tu-16 Bombers. Also, Aleksania is said to be sending the RAS Aleksania and the RAS Battle of Johnson Bay to provide air support for a possible invasion of Fiji.

More News as it is Released

sweet. Kings Point can help defend Aleksania against Fiji attack if needed

thank you (just for the record, i did this because: a, I really need more people in my country, and b, you have to admit, its getting kinda boring around here)

:shock: :shock: :shock:

I couldn't stop laughing when I read Fiji ! I can't wait to see how this war unfolds, good luck Aleksania

well, didn't want to get to over my head, and one less military junta in the world makes the world a better place (theoretically, wouldn't want to anger the N koreans )

As Rafforsia is within the South East Asian region, it could provide military support should Aleksania requested for military support.

Fiji's Capital of Suva has fallen. The War is over. Aleksania has annonced it will make Fiji a territory of Aleksania to avoide further conflic with Aleksania

:shock: no pictures??? awww darn lols. I just hope that y'all didnt kill too many people....

no, onl about 20 people (15 fiji, 5 aleksanian) died also who said no pics. i just havent go them u yet

haha ok can't wait for em then!

Aleksanian Bombing Suva

:affraid: :affraid: wow.

(((actualy iraq)))

Republic of Aleksania vs. George Tiiglaar
January 4, 2010
The Honorable Judge Dmitry Alekseev presiding

Charge – Plotting Nuclear Terrorism, Possession of Weapons Grade Uranium, Theft, Hijacking, Plotting to Build Nuclear Weapons, Murder in the 1st Degree, Treason, Participating in Terrorist Activities

Min. Sentence – Death by Lethal Injection
Max. Sentence – Death by Hanging, Death by Firing Squad

Bailiff – Sgt. Robert Adams


Proceedings


Sentence – Death By Hanging

Crimes Convicted – Plotting Nuclear Terrorism, Possession of Weapons Grade Uranium, Plotting to Build Nuclear Weapons, Murder in the 1st Degree, Participating in Terrorist Activities, Treason, Hijacking, Theft

As of now, George Tiiglaar’s Aleksanian Citizenship has been revoked, all properties of his nationalized, and all his bank accounts frozen.

He is scheduled to executed on: Saturday, January 9th, 2010

whoa whoa whoa. You can't execute him . Its against The AIN Human Rights

Actually, it's not. The AIN human rights charter does not prevent individual countries from using the death penalty. This was one of the main sticking points with the initial draft.

He can't be tortured, forced into slavery or anything like that, but he can be executed, provided it isn't done in a cruel, Dickensian fashion, such as stoned to death, drawn and quartered or burned at the stake.

Well it has to go through the AIN court. He already signed it up. Sorry so no execution for now. Once you sign up it goes thru the AIN Supreme Court

Also direct quote from the Constitution. I was wrong in some areas saying execution wasnt allowed. But by our law here it is:

• 6.11 - No one shall be executed under law in the following terms
  
• 6.11.1 - Death by Firing Squad
  
• 6.11.2 - Death by Hanging
  
• 6.11.3 - Death by Electrocution
  
• 6.11.4 - Death by any other means of torture
  
  
• 6.12 - Execution may be done under the following terms
  
• 6.12.1 - Death by Lethal Injection
  
• 6.12.2 - Death by any other term of non-torture
  

Yeah, I believe that would be a case for the AIN High Court to handle

Tyler wrote:Yeah, I believe that would be a case for the AIN High Court to handle

I agree i think this will be AIN High courts first case

I signed up Robert Tiiglaar. Also, he was tried in a military court, because this case involves Treason

Well either way your sentence wont be accepted by AIN. Its against AIN law under the Constitution

I will go through the AIN Supreme Court though. This is also considered attempted genocide because of possessing the materials to make a nuclear weapon. And also, if im not mistaken, the AIN constitution is still in its rough draft form. Also, I think if it is in effect, we should allow military executions by firing squad (i'm not sure how thats toucher, unless the firing squad has really bad aim or are intently trying to make it painful, a shot to the head is painless (i would think, i've never actually experienced it))

Its still torture. Its inhuman to kill a person like that. Thing is we dont know if they experience pain tho. Even a millisecond of pain is not allowed. AIN constitution isnt in rough draft. Its fully in effect. We just add to it from time to time on new laws. Thats why a full version is currently posted

Aleksfacco, I know your very young, but perhaps you should track down a copy of "Executions." It's a documentary showing actual executions, some of which are extremely horrific. Watching it once is enough to turn anyone off the death penalty.

Here is a run down of how long it takes someone to die when executed:

Lethal injection - up to 30 minutes. Extremely painful, feels as though entire body is on fire.

Hanging - anywhere from a few minutes to a few hours. If the rope is too short, the victim dies from slow strangulation. Too long and their head is ripped off their body.

Shooting - Anywhere up to four hours. Victims bleed to death if not killed by initial trauma. Your claim that a shot to the head is painless is grossly off the mark. A person may, after being shot in the head, appear dead, but they exist in a schizophrenic hell until they die.

Electrocution - Anywhere up to an hour. The victim is cooked alive.

Apart from the horrendous death, there are three other considerations:
1. Should a person, even having been convicted, not have every right and opportunity to clear their name? Even the courts get things wrong sometime and you can't release a person who is later proven innocent if they are dead.
2. Isn't life in a cage worse than death? If you really want to punish someone, stick them in prison and forget about them. They will spend years, decades in fact, pining for freedom, but knowing they can never have it. To me, life without parole is by far the harshest punishment a civilised society can inflict. Which brings me to my last point:
3. Does the death penalty have any place in a civilised society? How can a society hold the right to life up as sacred, when the State effectively sanctions murder?