Approved: Full Membership | Lydosia

I know I got banned, but I understood why now... perhaps I'm active and Peter said that I had a good CJ. Well this is some pics (didn't had time to work this week on Prodisiac more, because I had exams, alot of works, orals, etc. for school.

Fiche de la République (made by me, sorry Nate, didn't took urs cuz it'll be plagia )


























it's now your choice!

Obviously, I would say YES. You have an excellent CJ with superb detail. But, I don't think my vote counts.

DCMetro34 wrote:Obviously, I would say YES. You have an excellent CJ with superb detail. But, I don't think my vote counts.

...sorry Patrick, only admins can vote

Thanks for your application. Here's my review/vote:

Activeness
No doubt, you have always been active and participating in just about a lot of things, no problem here. YES

CJ Improvement
Haha I dont think I see any improvement, because I think your CJ is already good! Not perfect, but great CJ! YES

Contribution and Asset
This is where we have an issue. There's a sense of god moding in the tones of some of your posts, even though you probably dont mean to. You put "duh?" in a lot of your earlier posts, you double posted several times, which earned you a ban. You are helpful to our members, but some posts, you tend to be arrogant about your sim city nation and your real world country. I think you have contributed a lot, and I think you are an asset to AIN, but as far a good one, I'm not sure. I want to see an improvement of you getting along with the members and your behavior. NO

Overall: I'm going to have to say NO. Sorry.

I knew it...

Activeness
There is no problem with your activeness on this forum and no question that in this category you will get a YES

CJ Improvement
Obviously you have a great CJ so you couldn't really improve all that much... YES

Contribution and Asset
Peter is right when he says you are kind arrogant or maybe even slightly rude when it comes to your country and roleplaying. When it comes to your ban I know that you will have no problem in the future with double posting. Basically if in the next month or so we see your attitude about things change then we can reconsider you for full membership. NO

Overall: NO, sorry.

Surely having 2 yes' and one no equals a yes? (You could debate that at the Summit III btw). It's like having a 2-1 majority yes, but still saying no?
Or do I just not understand the system? :pale:

Thanks guys, perhaps I knew that it was my problem, that you won't accept me to the Contribution, sorry if I was arrogant, but I'm a natural bit arrogant! Hopefully, it wasn't as rude as i though your messages Admins, thanks!

Thomas: I think it's all or none, if there's a NO, it's No, if it's all yes, it's YES! XD

It's not horrible Blakeway it just is kinda bad i guess... hope that makes sense

and yes Thomas it is all or none as Blakeway said.

Okay, thanks for clearing that up Tyler.

Thanks Tyler

haha no no!

When there's a junior application, everyone can vote. And majority goes.
When there's a full member application, only admins can vote. And majority goes. So if there's three yes and one no(there's only four possible votes), then blake becomes a full member. But right now there's two no's(tyler and me, i think. Not really sure what Tyler's answer is... )

As for my vote, my criterias may have two yes and one no, but my overall vote can still be yes or no. I find contribution and asset criteria to be a major checkmark.

they didn't mean that you have to have all of the admins vote yes.. they were talking about how the majority of mine and yours were yeses but he got an overall no... and my vote is no.. thats why on overall it says NO

haha my bad! I didnt see your actual vote, I only saw this post: so I was confused

Tyler wrote:It's not horrible Blakeway it just is kinda bad i guess... hope that makes sense

and yes Thomas it is all or none as Blakeway said.

Edit: After I realise that voting to upgrade members are only done by admins after I've completed by assessment, I originally wanted to delete everything I wrote but I've decided to keep this for what purpose I don't know.

Activeness
You are certainly active. Everyday I see you online (only counting those that you were not away) and, on top of that, I will alway see at least posted once everyday on the forums. A yes from me.

CJ Improvements
Need I say more? Yes.

Service (Contribution and Asset)
Although uncommon, the recent ban on your account did really affect your potential of upgrading to full membership. Yet, as I am willing to accept the fact that you may be unaware of the double posting rule, I have decided to cover one eye on that issue. In your Services to the Alliance of Independent Nations, you did attempt to contribute several political-related ideas towards our community, despite the fact that most of your contributions are related to your CJ. Therefore, a Yes from me.

Therefore, in overall, I will give you a yes for your upgrading application.

However, as said earlier, I can't vote as I'm not an admin. So, by right, my vote is deemed as void.

Thanks Aran...

Not a problem. :!:

Activeness
Your certainly active. Which is great so. YES

CJ Improvement
Great improvement in your CJing skills over the last 2 months so YES

Contribution and Asset
Peter
is right. You've kinda showed disrespect for the admins. Which does upset as the President. I say work hard In February. And reapply So NO

Overall: NO, sorry. Reapply next month

Sure!