Day 3 : Nations Relations

Today hot spot:


Topic: Union members relation
Introduction: Every nations have a relation with other.
Discussion:
1. Should there is a union wide relation chart?
2. Should every nations have its own relation chart?
3. Should we have a scheduled bilateral summit in order to improve the relations?
4. Do you have any suggestion about this?

1. Should there is a union wide relation chart?
Nope, it'll be too messy

2. Should every nations have its own relation chart?
Yup

3. Should we have a scheduled bilateral summit in order to improve the relations?
Maybe.

4. Do you have any suggestion about this?
If nations need to imrpove their relations, do a summit, talk, etc. It's all about you to decide.

1. Should there is a union wide relation chart?

Of course, because we should be update to relations between all countries.

2. Should every nations have its own relation chart?

Yes, of course. Nowadays many Nation have them own relation chart.

3. Should we have a scheduled bilateral summit in order to improve the relations?

I think we don't need a scheduled bilateral summit to improve our relations because each nation should decided when they want to do the summit and probably two enemies are with no interest to do a summit.

4. Do you have any suggestion about this?

Sorry, but no. International relations are a decisions of each nation.

Miguel, why do you always use exclamation marks?

Because I am exclamating like in a discurss and why you don't put final marks?

Well, when you talk, you're not screaming everytime...

"Mom! I fail it! I fail the exam!"

You won't talk like that...

Lol, but in Portuguese exclamation marks are not only for exclamations, exclamation marks can have the same function has the final marks (or points).

Use the dot!

1. Should there is a union wide relation chart?

No. It's too messy and would take too much time. It would stagnate.

2. Should every nations have its own relation chart?

If they want to.

3. Should we have a scheduled bilateral summit in order to improve the relations?

I think bilateral summits should be organised between individual nations, but they should certainly be encouraged.

4. Do you have any suggestion about this?

Only to say that we should be of the mind that relations between nations do not necessarily reflect relations between individuals. Take Arcacia and Aleksania for example. Arcacia considers Aleksania a rogue state. However, myself and Aleks still get along really well. We always have.

1. Should there is a union wide relation chart?

No, as Dan said, it would stagnate, like the AINwiki

2. Should every nations have its own relation chart?

Its up to them. Some already have them.

3. Should we have a scheduled bilateral summit in order to improve the relations?

Yes, definitely, if the aim is to foster constructive discussion.

4. Do you have any suggestion about this?

Always do not take roleplay for serious

MiguelLeal wrote:Lol, but in Portuguese exclamation marks are not only for exclamations, exclamation marks can have the same function has the final marks (or points).

Lol. Now I get some confirmation why you like to use "!" to end the sentence. All this while, I thought it must be some sort of a sentence structre for the Portuguese language.

-----

1. Should there is a union wide relation chart?
No, no, unless we can simplify it.

2. Should every nations have its own relation chart?
It's up to the member's choice. If they want to do it, by all means, If not, we can't force them.

3. Should we have a scheduled bilateral summit in order to improve the relations?
Same as Qns 2.

4. Do you have any suggestion about this?
Just one: Have a thread of all countries (including dependencies) that are member of AIN so that all of us don't have to search for all AIN countries and miss any out.

Surely I ever missed Lanaya when I ask the country info. So I agree with Aran.

1. Should there is a union wide relation chart?
It would be too messy Ex: (Im using Bob, Escambia, Fornax, Bangorai')
Bob - Escambia : Good
Bob - Fornax: Bad
Bob - Bangorai': Good
Escambia - Fornax: Bad
Escambia - Bangorai': Bad
Fonax - Bangorai': Bad


2. Should every nations have its own relation chart?
Yes

3. Should we have a scheduled bilateral summit in order to improve the relations?
No

4. Do you have any suggestion about this?
Not really

Bangorai' *...

Bangori?

I don't think any of it is needed.

lol I don't think it should be a requirement.

Maybe that wouldn't be that messy like this...

that's just a part of all the nations. Put all the nations and you'll see

Still, it would need to be updated regularly, just look at the AIN Budgets, Stock Exchange etc. It won't work.

1. Should there is a union wide relation chart? No
2. Should every
nations have its own relation chart? If they decide they want to then sure
3. Should we have a scheduled
bilateral summit in order to improve the relations? Again thats up to the nations
4. Do you have
any suggestion about this? No

1. Should there is a union wide relation chart?

I think so, I mean I could volunteer getting it set up it needs be I'm sure there's a way we can make it less cluttered.

2. Should every nations have its own relation chart?

If they dont want to, they dont have to.

3. Should we have a scheduled bilateral summit in order to improve the relations?

Yes, definitely.

4. Do you have any suggestion about this?

With the hemisphere meeting implemented, having a scheduled bilateral summit shouldn't be a problem.

kccl35 wrote:1. Should there is a union wide relation chart?

No, as Dan said, it would stagnate, like the AINwiki

Zing! haha

1. Should there is a union wide relation chart?
I'll go with the flow: no. Charts should be the will and responsibility of each individual nation.
2. Should every nations have its own relation chart?
As above, having such a chart should be a choice for each nation.
3. Should we have a scheduled bilateral summit in order to improve the relations?
I think we should again leave it up to a nation/nations to host their own Non-Union summits.
4. Do you have any suggestion about this?
Sticky the Chart to the CJ section, use a color code for quick reference and those who cannot read. Oh, and have a template made and posted in the University Section.

Liberater444 wrote:...use a color code for quick reference and those who cannot read.

This may be a silly question, but do any illiterates even use the Internet? Reading is more or less necessary for using most websites, including ours. Still, color-coding the charts would be useful for quick reference, as you suggested.

1. Should there be a union wide relations chart?
As has already been said, maintaining such a chart would be prohibitively time-consuming, so no.

2. Should every nation have its own relations chart?
It should be left up to the individual members if they want their nations to have such charts.

3. Should we have a scheduled bilateral summit in order to improve relations?
No. Bilateral summits should be arranged only by the participants, when they want to have one.

4. Do you have any suggestions about this?
Nope.

woodb3kmaster wrote:

Liberater444 wrote:...use a color code for quick reference and those who cannot read.

This may be a silly question, but do any illiterates even use the Internet? Reading is more or less necessary for using most websites, including ours. Still, color-coding the charts would be useful for quick reference, as you suggested.

I believe he's trying to say "those who cannot read" as in those who have trouble looking at each nation's relations due to the clutter.