Day 4

Today hot spot


Topic : AIN Travel, Nuclear non Proliferation Treaty.
Introductions:AIN Travel,
Nuclear non Proliferation Treaty
Discussion:
AIN Travel:
1. Should we do the AIN Travel?
2. Should we make a new subforum about AIN travel ?
3. Do you have any suggestion about this?
Nuclear non Proliferation Treaty
4. What do you think about this?
5. How should member do if they have Nuclear weapon?
5. What do you think about this?

You double posted

Thanks

Dryan, I hope you don't mind if I add on the topics being discussed on the title.

AIN Travel:
1. Should we do the AIN Travel?
In my POV, maybe.

2. Should we make a new subforum about AIN travel ?
I think we should to avoid confusion.

3. Do you have any suggestion about this?
Nope.

Nuclear non Proliferation Treaty
4. What do you think about this?
A good move.

5. How should member do if they have Nuclear weapon?
AIN Court if that member sign the Treaty. If not, impose sanctions just like how countries in real-life sanctioned both North Korea and Iran.

AIN Travel:
1. Should we do the AIN Travel?
Let's try it and we'll see if it works

2. Should we make a new subforum about AIN travel ?
Agree with Aran.

3. Do you have any suggestion about this?
Well, a schedule will be great. (like today, it's Ollingdale presented by Peter)

Nuclear non Proliferation Treaty
4. What do you think about this?
Totally agree.

5. How should member do if they have Nuclear weapon?
Agree with Aran, and that's what we all did.

6. What do you think about this?
Nuclear weapons are for cowards. These are countries that do not fight like humans, but as gods. Are we gods? Not at all.

P.S. For the question 6, I had a better awnser but it was in French...

AIN Travel:

1. Should we do the AIN Travel?

Why not?

2. Should we make a new subforum about AIN travel ?

We don't need confusion!

3. Do you have any suggestion about this?

No.

Nuclear non Proliferation Treaty

4. What do you think about this?

Very important Treaty, not only because of dangerous and self-destruction wars but ,too, of taking care of evironment and avoiding wars!

5. How should member do if they have Nuclear weapon?

Agree with Aran.

6. What do you think about this?

I think the right choice is drop nuclear weapons if some Nation don't do that they have to be highly punished!

1. Should we do the AIN Travel?
Yes.

2. Should we make a new subforum about AIN travel?
The current system I use (PMs) works well.

3. Do you have any suggestion about this?
A schedule would be nice. Making it more active too.

Nuclear non Proliferation Treaty
4. What do you think about this?
Best idea ever. We don't need countries waving their nukes around to show how strong they are.

5. How should member do if they have Nuclear weapon?
Dismantle them within a reasonable timeframe. There's no point in keeping them.

AIN Travel:
1. Should we do the AIN Travel?
I like the idea- lets try it!
2. Should we make a new subforum about AIN travel?
Yep
3. Do you have any suggestion about this?
No

Nuclear non Proliferation Treaty
4. What do you think about this?
Im all for it.
5. How should member do if they have Nuclear weapon?
Ditto to the others
6. What do you think about this?
Its a good move.

Aranho wrote:Dryan, I hope you don't mind if I add on the topics being discussed on the title.

AIN Travel:
1. Should we do the AIN Travel?
In my POV, maybe.

2. Should we make a new subforum about AIN travel ?
I think we should to avoid confusion.

3. Do you have any suggestion about this?
Nope.

Nuclear non Proliferation Treaty
4. What do you think about this?
A good move.

5. How should member do if they have Nuclear weapon?
AIN Court if that member sign the Treaty. If not, impose sanctions just like how countries in real-life sanctioned both North Korea and Iran.

I agree with Aran.

AIN Travel:
1. Should we do the AIN Travel?
Yes, I bet it will be nice.
2. Should we make a new subforum about AIN travel?
Yes, it will avoid confusion and give importance to the thing...
3. Do you have any suggestion about this?
Not at the moment.

Nuclear non Proliferation Treaty
4. What do you think about this?
I don't think it is a good movement for us. Before banning nuclear weapons, we must find a way to defend us against those who have. The Atlantic Federation will not destroy its nuclear weapons until the IAMS - Intercontinetal Anti-Missiles System is done, so, we can defend our borders from nuclear missiles before they get to us. Instead of this, we propose the AIN to join us in our research program, with money, or engeniers, or equipment. In return, we will give all the new technologies we find to those who contributed directly or indirectly (with money and equipment) with the research plans.
5. How should member do if they have Nuclear weapon?
Keep them.
6. What do you think about this?
Risked at the moment.

I think the only mesure to defend us from nuclear weapon is to destroy those nuclear weapons, to ban them.

1. Should we do the AIN Travel?
I say sure why not

2. Should we make a new subforum
about AIN travel ?
Yes, but only if we have enough space to do so
3. Do you have any suggestion about this?

Nope

Nuclear non Proliferation Treaty
4. What do you think about this?
Good idea. In the case of Aleksania had this been agreed apon earlier may have stopped the incident

5.
How should member do if they have Nuclear weapon?
Members agreeing the to the treaty should dismantle their weapons within a reasonable time frame

1. Should we do the AIN Travel?

Yes. I think it's a good idea.

2. Should we make a new subforum about AIN travel ?

Yes.

3. Do you have any suggestion about this?

No.

Nuclear non Proliferation Treaty
4. What do you think about this?

As the country that instigated it, Arcacia is all for it.

5. How should member do if they have Nuclear weapon?

If they have signed the treaty, they should dismantle weapons in a timely manner. If they have not signed, they should be encouraged to do so.

1. Should we do the AIN Travel?
Absolutely (see #3)
2. Should we make a new subforum about AIN travel ?
Yeppers
3. Do you have any suggestion about this?
My only suggestion is that we should do it. (see #1)

Nuclear non Proliferation Treaty
4. What do you think about this?
It's good for those who wish to sign.
5. How should member do if they have Nuclear weapon?
If the members are signatory, then they should abide by the rules of the Treaty.
5. What do you think about this?
I will use the statement that I gave on the voting board: "The Tirnreich will not be signing at this time."

1. Should we do the AIN Travel?
Yeah

2. Should we make a new subforum about AIN travel ?
Yes, if there is suitable room

3. Do you have any suggestion about this?
Nuclear non Proliferation Treaty
I agree with it.

4. What do you think about this?
A very good process

5. How should member do if they have Nuclear weapon?
The best answer comes form Aran. It says it all.

AIN Travel:

1. Should we do the AIN Travel?
Yah, Its a good idea

2. Should we make a
new subforum about AIN travel ?
No, I don't think it is necissary

3. Do you have any suggestion about
this?
No

Nuclear non Proliferation Treaty
4. What do you think about
this?
Until the point has been reached that Aleksania has capabilities to stop nuclear attacks and stop other nations from acting aggressively towards Aleksania, Aleksania will NOT under any circumstances disarm its nuclear weapons. Although if you can get China, India, Pakistan, and Iran to disarm their nuclear weapons, Aleksania will disarm theirs. (As the countries above are the main nuclear threats to Aleksania)
5. How should member do if they have Nuclear weapon?
Keep them until they become unnecessary.