Proposal | Law to not let non-ain nations that players create get involved in AIN.

Recently, there has been a rise in the number of nations that are involved in AIN matters that are not a part of the Union. When we have role-playing on the AIN forums, it should only include countries and states that are a part of the Alliance. This issue was raised briefly in the AIN meeting on the 10th July. Well I propose to not let people role-play in AIN with non-AIN nations, but that they may talk about their non-ain nations in their newspapers, media, etc. What do you think?

Thanks Thomas for your help

I like it... I think that people should be able to role-play with non member nations by themselves, but they shouldn't get them involved in the whole AIN. Like Brenzaltan was bad because it effected the whole AIN, if Brenzaltan just effected Shushtrepistaz I wouldn't have had a problem.

I'm in favour of this. It gets confusing.

I completely agree.
Since I helped write it.

Don't forget AIN is like European Union in real life so we should have exterior contact with other nations , in other words: we shouldn't be closed in only AIN World.

No we aren't the European Union - and never will be. We are a SimCity 4 group, where people with fictitious countries can show them off.
We are not a website where people can bring in random countries that they make up in about 10 minutes so they can play around a bit.

It's not how the system works.

We won't include France to come take a role-play in AIN. Do you see Canada come in EU session to say: "Hey, I'm harper, I want all the islands there" or "May I be in the Euro Zone?". No.

I like it. A lot

Me too, Brenzaltan is getting old,

You did this a cause of me

No, not just you. It's been in discussion for quite a while, actually.

This is get confusing!

Not really - we want a ban on people using non-AIN nations in role-plays.

Ok... When starts the votation?

Thomas wrote:No we aren't the European Union - and never will be. We are a SimCity 4 group, where people with fictitious countries can show them off.
We are not a website where people can bring in random countries that they make up in about 10 minutes so they can play around a bit.

It's not how the system works.

I strongly; strongly agree with Thomas

To also include on this. This bill I once propose in January and Dan and I have come to an understanding.

We should keep real life countries out of any AIN role-playing events or AIN affiliated Organization with the exception of Newspapers, and CJ's.

Yes. Countries external to the AIN should be kept out of role-play. This includes real-life countries, except when dealing with CJs or anything that could be considered an extension of CJs, such as media reports, transportation or anything else that is the domain of an individual member and does not affect roleplay or involve other member states.

^Agreed. I fully support this proposal.

MiguelLeal wrote:Ok... When starts the votation?

The word votation doesn't exist, it's voting in English, just so you know. I know it's hard.

So when do we move forward with this bill?

Thank you Thomas, thanks for you help! So I will agree with this!

I'll pass this.