AIN v. East Rockcoast
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
AIN v. East Rockcoast
Plaintiff(s): FCR Republic of Starfishland
Defendant: Republic of East Rockcoast
Charge: Republic has breached the Constitution of the AIN, section 6.0, Human Rights for banning christian immigrants.
Defendant: Republic of East Rockcoast
Charge: Republic has breached the Constitution of the AIN, section 6.0, Human Rights for banning christian immigrants.
Last edited by 976 on 3rd October 2010, 09:38; edited 1 time in total
Re: AIN v. East Rockcoast
Surely that's changed now that the country has been taken over by two European countries (which would be Christian)?
Thomas- Overlord of Eurasia
- Posts : 5849
Similar topics
» Embassies in East Rockcoast
» Rep. of East Rockcoast bid for the AIN Summit 2010
» Import East Rockcoast producs
» East Rockcoast territorial area
» West Zone | L4A | East Rockcoast
» Rep. of East Rockcoast bid for the AIN Summit 2010
» Import East Rockcoast producs
» East Rockcoast territorial area
» West Zone | L4A | East Rockcoast
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum