One Union Party

Manifesto

Threw years of knowledge building, testing ideas, and seeing just what works, and what doesn't, the One Union Party runs on a platform of certain values, mainly the value of our union first. We share the idea that the AIN should adopt an official policy of isolation and that any official communication with outside unions/organizations should be outlawed. We come to this conclusion with five years union experience, and what we have learned from other unions with similar policies.

The AIN has weathered many storms, some due to it's own members actions, and others done by the hands of an foreign influence. The threat of this reoccurring unfortunately remains, and we must protect our selves from that threat. We feel, with our experience and examples isolation is not only the best solution, but also the easiest to implement. With our skilled team we can turn the AIN into a union that will weather anything that comes it's way, modernize our policies to meet the new challenges that face us.

Culture and creativity also represent us, and our policies. We work hard to find solutions for all our problems, and we strive to create an atmosphere all our members can enjoy. We feel we have the team to do the job, and to do it right, to bring back the events that you all enjoyed, to bring back that sense of peace that has lost us for so long now. Together we can make all this a reality, together we can strive.

Vote One Union in 2012, vote for your values.



Member List

Cormiermax - Party President
Blakeway - Ministry for Innovation, Trade and Investment critic
Smartbylaw - Citizen Affairs critic

Positions Open

Party Leader
Ministry for Culture, Arts and Sport critic
AINSI critic
Foreign Affairs critic
Ministry for Transport and Infrastructure critic
Ministry for Justice and Constitutional Affairs critic

I have a few questions:

When you say critic, what do you mean? Are they studying the work of current ministers, or what?

Also, has this idea of creating political parties been supported by the Executive or in a union vote? Political parties have been tried before and haven't worked.

Do we honestly need the executives approval? After all, it is our opinion.

We need to discuss it openly to ensure that the union doesn't descend back into two teams again, like last year.
I am asking a question and I'm not voicing an opinion on the matter - so please don't go all defensive, in this thread or the other one.

Parties have not been approved by the Parliament. Therefore, they are illegal. If you want to initiate parties, the motion must first pass through the chamber. The constitution need to be amended to allow it.

The Ministry for Justice and Constitutional Affairs has no option but to place an injunction on this party until such a motion has been made and carried.

Daniel wrote:Parties have not been approved by the Parliament. Therefore, they are illegal. If you want to initiate parties, the motion must first pass through the chamber. The constitution need to be amended to allow it.

The Ministry for Justice and Constitutional Affairs has no option but to place an injunction on this party until such a motion has been made and carried.

Until such a time where parties are recognized by parliament, 1 Union will officially be known as a group rather than a political party.

Thomas wrote:I have a few questions:

When you say critic, what do you mean? Are they studying the work of current ministers, or what?

Also, has this idea of creating political parties been supported by the Executive or in a union vote? Political parties have been tried before and haven't worked.

A Critic is the person in charge of giving the groups view on that department.

This topic has also been locked until legislation and/or a motion is passed for parties to exist under the AIN structure.

If you have any further comments or wish this to be moved as a discussion thread, please contact an admin along with the Minister for Justice and Constitutional Affairs.

Neil