Constitutional Draft...maybe???

Here's my draft I was talking about. Let me know what you think! Don't hesitate to add/remove anything

It's nice. But I think we should wait a bit more and debate on the rules we want.

I thought we discussed this in the Summit? Orchid I understand you weren't there but we basically came to the conclusion (I may be wrong someone correct me if I am) That we would just let the rules be unspoken except for a few forum rules.

No offense to the SU but it failed why would we try to copy or work off of something that ultimately failed? The only thing we need to work on is how we will be dividing the power in the union and we sort of stopped at the end of the summit Im assuming we'll pick it back up again in the next summit. I believe it was Petrovar ambassador and I have submitted similar plans for how this will be done but for now Matt is in charge and everything must pass a majority vote.

Well, I let you discuss there but only a few persons posted and this is what we have :

* be nice to other members, and no offensive language
* no spam
* have fun!
No offensive words, swear words for example
No nudity pictures.
I would say some sexual content can be allowed as long as you don't show anything exposed.

We can't really put them in a Constitutional Draft. that's why we should debate about it in the future. As about the SU, we shouldn't copy them.

Matt wrote:.
I would say some sexual content can be allowed as long as you don't show anything exposed.

we're all guys right?

Well I offer this for my rebuttal

That was a draft. It was never used in the SU. I don't know why, everyone claimed to like it but it stop there. When I try to move with it, it would lead to arguments, the whole "pointing fingers" to who is trying to control the union, etc, etc. So it sat in limbo.

Anyways, I'll wait until the next summit before I try to hit the ground running next time 8)

That was a quote from saathoff. ::