AIN Forums 1.0
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

+14
Blakeway4
Liberater444
Tyler
Aranho
Saathoff
anarchy0029
woodb3kmaster
JJ
MiguelLeal
Thomas
KoV Liberty
Kevin
emgmod
Neil
18 posters

Page 1 of 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Daniel 2nd June 2010, 22:21

Plaintiff(s): Republic of Arcacia, Lycanth Republic, Sovereign Crowned Republic of Holidia,
United Republic of Illu'a, Republic of Corraile, Royal Atrubian Empire,
United Islands of Ollingdale, Fairview Democratic Republic, Kingdom of Hypertrophy,
Imperial Republic of the Tirnreich (others may be added)

Defendant: Republic of Aleksania

Charge: Use of a weapon of mass destruction, type nuclear.

The Republic of Aleksania has, without any warning or consultation with the international community, detonated on 2 June 2010 a nuclear device as an act of war. This was done in the vicinity of other AIN member states who may be affected by fallout.

(To add your nation as a plaintiff, post below with your country's name followed by "in support.")


Last edited by danspaceman on 8th June 2010, 06:26; edited 9 times in total
Daniel
Daniel
On Leave

Posts : 2333
Age : 44 Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Neil 2nd June 2010, 22:34

Holidia in support
Neil
Neil
Chargé d'Affaires

Posts : 1130
Age : 30 Male

http://neilmoore.org.uk

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Guest 3rd June 2010, 00:17

East Rockcoast will.
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by emgmod 3rd June 2010, 04:06

Illu'a in support.

Nice job Dan the Lawsuit Man.
emgmod
emgmod
High Commissioner

Posts : 1536
Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Kevin 3rd June 2010, 04:11

Corraile supports this lawsuit.
Kevin
Kevin
Prime Minister

Posts : 2265
Age : 27 Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by KoV Liberty 3rd June 2010, 04:34

Atrubia in support.
avatar
KoV Liberty
Town Clerk

Posts : 144
Age : 29 Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Thomas 3rd June 2010, 11:55

Ollingdale supports this lawsuit.
(Wow - does that mean Ollingdale is working with... Arcacia??? :shock: )
Thomas
Thomas
Overlord of Eurasia

Posts : 5849
Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by MiguelLeal 3rd June 2010, 13:06

Fairview in support!
MiguelLeal
MiguelLeal
Chancellor

Posts : 2111
Age : 28 Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Neil 3rd June 2010, 15:29

Thomas wrote:Ollingdale supports this lawsuit.
(Wow - does that mean Ollingdale is working with... Arcacia??? :shock: )

:affraid:
Neil
Neil
Chargé d'Affaires

Posts : 1130
Age : 30 Male

http://neilmoore.org.uk

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Guest 3rd June 2010, 15:32

I amnt sure bout it.
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by emgmod 3rd June 2010, 16:04

If everyone's the plaintiff, who's the jury?
emgmod
emgmod
High Commissioner

Posts : 1536
Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Thomas 3rd June 2010, 16:11

emgmod wrote:If everyone's the plaintiff, who's the jury?

LOL. Can't we be... a bias jury? Cheeky/Razz
Thomas
Thomas
Overlord of Eurasia

Posts : 5849
Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by JJ 3rd June 2010, 17:31

Ascadylea is neutral and the jury
JJ
JJ
Permanent Secretary

Posts : 611
Age : 44 Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Aleks 3rd June 2010, 20:55

The Republic of Aleksania defends its actions on the points below:


The nuclear device was extremely small, with a yield of only about 30 tons of TNT.

This was not a terrorist outpost, it was the KSR Army, a CONVENTIONAL FORCE

This was a last ditch effort, on ALEKSANIAN soil, may I remind you.

The fallout was carefully predicted, and will ONLY fall on extremely sparsely populated areas, and those will all be inside Aleksania

Aleksania has every right to defend itself.

Aleksania would never attack an Allie such as Bob. This was against a country that had formally DECLARED WAR against Aleksania.

This was not a "useless use of a nuclear bomb." This was a matter of the survival of Aleksania. If this attack had not been made, Aleksania in all likelihood would have been snuffed out of existence. This was an action of LAST RESORT. Aleksania is willing to pay reparations to ANY citizen, Aleksanian or otherwise, that can offer proof that they have been harmed by the attacks.

The Republic of Aleksania stands behind its actions and WILL NOT except any sanctions. We have every right, as a sovereign nation, to defend ourselves. We find it appalling that any nation would think otherwise. Aleksania will use military force to defend these rights.



Aleksandr Fredrich Dziubla Facco
Chancellor, Republic of Aleksania
Aleks
Aleks
High Commissioner

Posts : 1713
Age : 29 Male

http://profile.imageshack.us/user/aleksfacco/

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Daniel 3rd June 2010, 21:12

The same objective could have been achieved with conventional weapons. The use of a nuclear device, however small, was completely unwarranted and an over-reaction.

Radioactivity has been measured by the Arcacian Space Agency up to 80,000 feet. This has meant significant disruption to air travel over the Pacific. An Arcacian Airlines 787 en route from Los Angeles to Redding when the bomb went off had to be diverted to South Korea. If it had detonated only 1 hour later, the shockwave may very well have knocked the plane out of the sky.

No warning was issued from Aleksania and it is only pure luck that the 107 Arcacians on board were not killed.

That Aleksania could not be bothered warning it's closest allies (up till now) about the impending bomb shows a complete lack of regard for the safety of citizens of countries not involved with it's own affairs.

The Republic of Arcacia will therefore proceed with this case and shall impose economic sanctions on Aleksania. All trade is suspended indefinitely. Aleksanian International Airlines has had their gate allowance at Redding International Airport rescinded and AIA is prohibited from entering Arcacian airspace. With the exception of an emergency, no Aleksanian aircraft may enter Arcacian airspace or land at any Arcacian airport. If they do, they will be seized by police and the crew arrested.

No Aleksanian ship may enter Arcacian waters. If they do, they will be seized by the Coast Guard and the crew arrested.

These restrictions also apply to Lycanthian territory.

The Republic of Arcacia now considers Aleksania to be a rogue state.
Daniel
Daniel
On Leave

Posts : 2333
Age : 44 Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Thomas 3rd June 2010, 21:24

The United Islands of Ollingdale will continue to push for sanctions against the nation of Aleksania, and supports the Republic of Arcacia's action. A review of the measures in place against Aleksania will take place in less than 24 hours, which may result in further restrictions on Aleksania in Ollingdale.
The ambassador has been expelled from the country after refusing to answer questions posed by the Ollingdale Government.

Lord Francis Devinson
Minister for Foreign Affairs
Thomas
Thomas
Overlord of Eurasia

Posts : 5849
Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Guest 4th June 2010, 02:06

After hear the Aleksanian, East Rockcoast went to a neutral party.
avatar
Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by KoV Liberty 4th June 2010, 02:11

Two Atrubian Aircraft planes, one commercial, one military, were flying in a 50 mile radius of the blast zone. No warning was given to these pilots who very well might have taken a direct route over the target. These reports have only yet sufficed. In World War Two, when the bombs were dropped, there were almost no commercial aircraft in the world at the time. The world today is much different!

Statements Declared by The Atrubian Legislature and Presidential Office

As of 9:20 PM 03 June, 2010 The Republic of Aleksania has shown a complete disregard for the sanctity of economies, and the world's way of life, therefore by Atrubian constitution has been declared a rogue nation.

All economic sanctions between Atrubia and Aleksania have been officially declared cut-off by the Atrubian Legislature at 9:25 PM.

As of 9:30 PM Aleksanian ships in Atrubian waters will be seized by our coast guard and detained, and ships present in port will unload their cargo they are taking to Aleksania and return to your country immediately.

All Atrubian Petroleum and Petroleum-based products have been cut-off from The Republic of Aleksania as of 9:30 PM.

As of 9:33 PM all tourists from Aleksania are to finish with their vacations ASAP and return to their country.

As of 9:37 PM all air traffic directly from Atrubia to Aleksania has been declared hazardous to the welfare of the Atrubian people and restricted. Only privately owned aircraft may fly to Aleksania at their own risk. NO AIRCRAFT may be chartered for a flight.

Lastly, as of 10:00 AM on Friday, June the 4th, ALL Aleksanian ships in Atrubian waters are ordered to be out of Atrubian Wters and Atrubian provinces. If they are not they will be seized by our coast guard and the occupants detained, and ships present in port will unload their cargo they are taking to Aleksania and return to your country immediately.

End Statements
avatar
KoV Liberty
Town Clerk

Posts : 144
Age : 29 Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by woodb3kmaster 4th June 2010, 03:56

aleksfacco wrote:The nuclear device was extremely small, with a yield of only about 30 tons of TNT.

OOC: Only 30 tons? The atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki had yields at least 500 times greater (15 kilotons). A nuclear device as small as Aleksania has claimed its bomb was would have produced a rather small explosion in comparison.

IC: The Federal Kingdom of Lower Columbia condemns this usage of a nuclear weapon in combat as an excessive use of force that has had serious consequences for AIN member nations in the vicinity of the blast site. Our government also finds the Aleksanian defense of its actions inadequate and incomplete. Indeed, it inspires more questions than it solves. Our questions to the defendant are as follows:

On what basis do you make the claim that "if this attack had not been made, Aleksania in all likelihood would have been snuffed out of existence"? Is there direct evidence that the KSR Army had the means and plans to destroy Aleksania in its entirety?
In what way was this attack a "last-ditch effort"? What other options were considered and ruled out prior to the decision to launch the nuclear weapon, if any?
Who is KSR? A review of Aleksania's conflict with this entity is necessary to place these recent events in context.
woodb3kmaster
woodb3kmaster
Permanent Secretary

Posts : 583
Age : 38 Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Kevin 4th June 2010, 04:17

The Republic of Corraile again condems the usage of a nuclear weapon, however small, to destroy a non-member state. This action not only threatened member nations but also could have killed more civilians who were none the wiser about this incident.

Corraile will uphold ots economic and diplomatic sanctions against Aleksania and will declare the latter to be a rogue state. Meanwhile, these restrictions have been lifted from Bob.
Kevin
Kevin
Prime Minister

Posts : 2265
Age : 27 Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by anarchy0029 4th June 2010, 05:22

Kingdom of Hypertrophy is in support.
anarchy0029
anarchy0029
Counsel

Posts : 754
Age : 47 Male

https://www.facebook.com/home.php#/home.php?ref=logo

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Saathoff 4th June 2010, 06:00

Escambia condemns the use of the nuclear bomb. As it is a direct violation of war rules.

Though Escambia supports this. I will act as the judge again. I have no bias. Though my country does. I will act out of my Presidential position of AIN.
Saathoff
Saathoff
Prime Minister

Posts : 2373
Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Aranho 4th June 2010, 19:38

If multiple judges are allowed, being the Minister of the AIN Department of Education, Safety and Health, I would like to be the judge if possible.

If not, then I'll remain neutral.
Aranho
Aranho
Sovereign

Posts : 3602
Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Saathoff 4th June 2010, 19:39

Well technically its suppose to be Tyler. but sinces hes not in AIN. I have to cover the position till elections.
Saathoff
Saathoff
Prime Minister

Posts : 2373
Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Aranho 4th June 2010, 20:54

I'm actually thinking of me and you co-judge together if possible. If not, then it's alright.
Aranho
Aranho
Sovereign

Posts : 3602
Male

Back to top Go down

Arcacia et al. V Aleksania Empty Re: Arcacia et al. V Aleksania

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 5 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum