Re: LOCKED | Bidding Committees

by **Blakeway4** 25th September 2010, 14:29

With 12 votes yes, I think it is passed?

by **Daniel** 25th September 2010, 23:29

I declare the motion passed.

by **MiguelLeal** 26th September 2010, 09:05

PASSED.

by **Saathoff** 27th September 2010, 03:15

Department of Administration

I, Nate Saathoff, President of the Department of Administration find the law passed unlawfully according to the AIN Constitution. I find this law declared NOT passed until further investigation from the Department of Administration.

According to the AIN Constitution this law would be a "Level 3: Order"
Because it would change the AIN Constitutional law on voting for bids and selecting a host.

Under this. The following voting options should be available: "Yes, No, Abstain, and Veto". Abstain and Veto were not listed above as options in this vote. Making it not a valid voting poll.

Also under the AIN Consitution is clearly states that the law in a Level 3: Order must pass with no, "No votes, or Vetos" This voting poll though illegal had 5 no's deeming it. NOT PASSED.

9.4 - [LEVEL 3]
Order:
9.4.1 - Can Be Proposed By: Department Heads, Administrators,
Union Founder
9.4.2 - Can Be Voted On By: Full Members, Department Heads,
Administrators, Union Founder
9.4.3 - Requires: 2/3 Majority (i.e. two votes
approval) and at least five confirmed votes for a minimum of 12 days
9.4.4 - Necessary
Poll options: [YES], [NO], [ABSTAIN], [VETO]
9.4.5 - Legal Status: Must be
ratified by all, no exceptions
9.4.6 - Examples: Forum Rules, Constitution,
extremely important laws etc

So in conclusion this law is NOT PASSED as of Sunday, September 26th, 2010. Investigation is now underway

by **Liberater444** 27th September 2010, 03:56

As an Admin, I also observe that this was illegally passed.

by **Daniel** 27th September 2010, 04:11

Why didn't you address this earlier? Why wasn't it brought to my attention when it was first proposed?

by **Liberater444** 27th September 2010, 04:16

Because the problem was in the polls, not the proposition.

by **Daniel** 27th September 2010, 04:17

How was it decided that this was a "Level 3"? Looking at the constitution, I can't see how it qualifies.

by **Tyler** 27th September 2010, 04:26

because it changes how things are voted on, which makes it a major change, not just a minor change in the forums. So therefore it would either have to be level 3.

by **Saathoff** 27th September 2010, 04:31

TOPIC IS LOCKED

All admins need to stop posting in the LOCKED thread.

(Admins still can post in locked topics)

by Sponsored content

Should we have bidding committees?